#LawRepositories - Breakout - Management of Repositories: Issues and Concerns
- The division between the two is a requirement of an abstract, which of course isn’t a bad idea whether it’s required or not.
Posted on March 30th, 2015
#LawRepositories - Kyle Courtney & James Heller - Copyright
- Identifying the author
- Lots and lots of § 106 rights in the bundle!
-
- Some rights retained by author
- What counts as an author’s “personal website"
-
- Sometimes it can be a repository site
- Other non-commericial rights
- The SPARC author addendum
- Faculty grant non-exclusive rights to repository for all future scholarly article
-
- § 205(e) - Nonexclusive licenses as written agreement
- Shifts the default; doesn’t force faculty.
- Experimenting with different strategies to get faculty involved
- Would receiving a DMCA takedown notice be embarrassing?
- Developing a “SHERPA/RoMEO" for law journals?
-
- There is a wiki — did not catch the name. [Help commenters?]
- Content license:
-
- Does § 108 first-sale apply? No way.
- Panelists seem to be highly NON risk-averse about the distribution of U.S. law review publications.
- No such cavalier attitude about professional publishing society.
Posted on March 30th, 2015
#LawRepositories - Paul Royster - Keynote - Shaping the Repository
- Service-first approach
- Make it easy
- Immediate feedback to authors
- Maximum uploading
- Repository belongs to the faculty / not to the university, or the people… (Interesting.)
- The unique collection, might be popular.
- You’ll never know
- Do it for them and they will approve
- Doesn’t believe in OA for the sake of OA
- CC licenses (but not a requirement)
- No depository mandate
- Control over IP scholars create
- It’s a publishing operation
- Print on demand
- Free ebooks
- 33 titles to date from publishing / really about access
- Audience: 25 million U.S. college students and faculty; 3 billion internet uses online
- Use library publishing as a bulwark against publishers
- Eventually replace them?
- Publishers exploit the faculty, bleed the library. We can make them stop.
- 1-page publishing agreement from UN-L. Posted on website.
- More information: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeaabout/1/
Posted on March 30th, 2015
#Duke4Dean Press
Posted on February 18th, 2015
Honoring Dean Smith
- The Inter-Faith Council for Social Service, based in Chapel Hill. The organization lives out Smith’s values of caring for the poor and those in need. For more information, contact The IFC.
- The Dean E. Smith Opening Doors Fund will support talented undergraduate students who need significant financial assistance to attend Carolina. It will also provide financial support to graduate students in education and social work — two fields close to Smith’s heart. For more information on the fund, contact UNC Development.
- Individuals may also give to the charity of their choice to honor Coach Smith and the values he exemplified."
Posted on February 9th, 2015
Things That Quicken The Heart
Posted on February 2nd, 2015
KitHead or KnitHead?
Posted on January 26th, 2015
Algorithmic Subjectivity
Posted on November 19th, 2014
One man willingly gave Google his data. See what happened next.
Despite some misgivings about the company’s product course and service permanence (I was an early and fanatical user of Google Wave), my relationship with Google is one of mutual symbiosis.
Posted on November 18th, 2014
Court agrees that Google’s search results qualify as free speech
The regulation of Google's search results has come up from time to time over the past decade, and although the idea has gained some traction in Europe (most recently with “right to be forgotten” laws), courts and regulatory bodies in the US have generally agreed that Google's search result
Posted on November 18th, 2014